Author:
Beaupert Fleur,Carney Terry,Chiarella Mary,Satchell Claudette,Walton Merrilyn,Bennett Belinda,Kelly Patrick
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore approaches to the regulation of healthcare complaints and disciplinary processes.
Design/methodology/approach
– A literature review was conducted across Medline, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the health, law and social sciences collections of Informit, using terms tapping both the complaints process and regulation generally.
Findings
– A total of 118 papers dealing with regulation of health complaints or disciplinary proceedings were located. The review reveals a shift away from self-regulation towards greater external oversight, including innovative regulatory approaches including “networked governance” and flexible or “responsive” regulation. It reports growing interest in adoption of strategic and responsive approaches to health complaints governance, by rejecting traditional legal forms in favor of more strategic and responsive forms, taking account of the complexity of adverse health events by tailoring responses to individual circumstances of complainants and their local environments.
Originality/value
– The challenge of how to collect and harness complaints data to improve the quality of healthcare at a systemic level warrants further research. Scope also exists for researching health complaints commissions and other “meta-regulatory” bodies to explore how to make these processes fairer and better able to meet the complex needs of complainants, health professionals, health services and society.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference100 articles.
1. Allsop, J.
and
Jones, K.
(2008), “Withering the citizen, managing the consumer: complaints in healthcare settings”, Social Policy and Society, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 233-243.
2. Anderson, K.
,
Allan, D.
and
Finucane, P.
(2001), “A 30-month study of patient complaints at a major Australian hospital”, Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 109-111.
3. Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care
(2004), Better Practice Guidelines on Complaints Management for Health Care Services, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
4. Bismark, M.M.
,
Dauer, E.A.
,
Paterson, R.
and
Studdert, D.M.
(2006b), “Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience”, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol. 175 No. 8, pp. 889-894.
5. Bismark, M.M.
,
Brennan, T.A.
,
Paterson, R.J.
,
Davis, P.B.
and
Studdert, D.M.
(2006a), “Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: a descriptive analysis of complainants and non-complainants following adverse events”, Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 17-22.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献