Cross-cultural comparability and validity of metacognitive knowledge in reading in PISA 2009: a comparison of two scoring methods-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cross-cultural comparability and validity of metacognitive knowledge in reading in PISA 2009: a comparison of two scoring methods

Published:2020-10-05 Issue:6 Volume:27 Page:635-654
ISSN:0969-594X
Container-title:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice

Author:

Zhou Ji¹^ORCID,He Jia¹²^ORCID,Lafontaine Dominique³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Leibniz-Institut Für Bildungsforschung Und Bildungsinformation (DIPF), Frankfurt am Main, Germany

2. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Leibniz-Institut Für Bildungsforschung Und Bildungsinformation (DIPF), Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands

3. Department of Education Science, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Education

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1828820

Reference51 articles.

1. Literature Review on Metacognition and its Measurement

2. Construct Validation of Metacognition

3. Diagnose von Strategiewissen beim Textverstehen

4. Authors. (2013).

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The impact of reading metacognitive strategies on mathematics learning efficiency and performance: An analysis using PISA 2018 data in China;Acta Psychologica;2024-06

2. Student well-being and mathematical literacy performance in PISA 2018: a machine-learning approach;Educational Psychology;2024-03-15

3. Which noncognitive features provide more information about reading performance? A data-mining approach to big educational data;Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology;2023-01

4. The Importance of Metacognitive Strategies in Reading Literacy-Results of the PISA Testing in Bosnia and Herzegovina;Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology;2022-07-26

5. A multilevel regression analysis of computer-mediated communication in synchronous and asynchronous contexts and digital reading achievement in Japanese students;Interactive Learning Environments;2022-05-02