Abstract
AbstractMajor depression is a severe mental disorder that is associated with strongly increased mortality. The quantification of its prevalence on regional levels represents an important indicator for public health reporting. In addition to that, it marks a crucial basis for further explorative studies regarding environmental determinants of the condition. However, assessing the distribution of major depression in the population is challenging. The topic is highly sensitive, and national statistical institutions rarely have administrative records on this matter. Published prevalence figures as well as available auxiliary data are typically derived from survey estimates. These are often subject to high uncertainty due to large sampling variances and do not allow for sound regional analysis. We propose a new area-level Poisson mixed model that accounts for measurement errors in auxiliary data to close this gap. We derive the empirical best predictor under the model and present a parametric bootstrap estimator for the mean squared error. A method of moments algorithm for consistent model parameter estimation is developed. Simulation experiments are conducted to show the effectiveness of the approach. The methodology is applied to estimate the major depression prevalence in Germany on regional levels crossed by sex and age groups.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Statistisches Bundesamt.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Psychology
Reference67 articles.
1. Albert, P. R. (2015). Why is depression more prevalent in women? Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 40(4), 219–221.
2. Arima, S., Bell, W. R., Datta, G. S., Franco, C., & Liseo, B. (2017). Multivariate Fay–Herriot Bayesian estimation of small area means under functional measurement error. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 180(4), 1191–1209.
3. Arima, S., & Polettini, S. (2019). A unit level small area model with misclassified covariates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 182(4), 1439–1462.
4. Arima, S., Datta, G. S., & Liseo, B. (2015). Bayesian estimators for small area models when auxiliary information is measured with error. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 42(1), 518–529.
5. Bell, W. R., Chung, H. C., Datta, G. S., & Franco, C. (2019). Measurement error in small area estimation: Functional versus naive models. Survey Methodology, 45(1), 61–80.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献