Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this study is to investigate how patterns of collaboration and scholarly independence are related to early stage researchers’ development in two multidisciplinary learning environments at a Swedish university. Based on interviews with leaders, supervisors, doctoral students, and post docs, results show how early stage researchers’ development is conditioned by their relative positions in time (career stage) and space (geographical and epistemic position). Through the theoretical notions of ‘epistemic living space’ and ‘developmental networks’, four ways of experiencing the multidisciplinary learning environment were distinguished. Overall, the environments provided a world of opportunities, where the epistemic living space entailed many possibilities for cross-disciplinary collaboration and development of scholarly independence among peers. However, depending on the members’ relative positions in time and space, this world became an alien world for the post docs who had been forced to become “over-independent” and find collaborators elsewhere. Moreover, it became an avoided world for absent mono-disciplinary supervisors and students who embodied “non-collective independence”, away from the environments’ community. By contrast, a joint world emerged for doctoral students located in the environment, which promoted their “independent positioning” and collaborative ambitions. Thus, early stage researchers’ collaboration and development of scholarly independence were optimised in a converged learning space, where the temporal and spatial conditions were integrated and equally conducive for learning. Based on these results, the authors provide suggestions for how to improve the integration of scholars who tend to develop away from the community because of their temporal and spatial positions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education
Reference41 articles.
1. Albert, Mathieu, Suzanne Laberge, and Brian D. Hodges. 2009. Boundary-work in the health research field: Biomedical and clinician scientists’ perceptions of social science research. Minerva 47(2): 171–194.
2. Baker, Vicki L., and Lisa R. Lattuca. 2010. Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education 35(7): 807–827.
3. Boden, Daniel, Maura Borrego, and Lynita K. Newswander. 2011. Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education 62(6): 741–755.
4. Boden, Daniel, Lisa D. McNair, and Maura Borrego. 2014. “Leave your discipline at the door”: Matching expectations for interdisciplinary collaboration among faculty members. Higher Education in Review 11: 1–29.
5. Borrego, Maura, and Lynita K. Newswander. 2010. Definitions of interdisciplinary research: Toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. The Review of Higher Education 34(1): 61–84.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献