Disentangling the local context—imagined communities and researchers’ sense of belonging

Author:

Horbach Serge P J M1ORCID,Sørensen Mads P1ORCID,Allum Nick2ORCID,Reid Abigail-Kate2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University , Bartholins Allé 7, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark

2. Department of Sociology, University of Essex , Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK

Abstract

Abstract It is generally agreed that researchers’ ‘local context’ matters to the successful implementation of research integrity policies. However, it often remains unclear what the relevant local context is. Is it the institutions and immediate working surroundings of researchers? Or, do we need to pay more attention to researchers’ epistemic communities if we want to understand their ‘local context’? In this paper, we examine this question by using the International Research Integrity Survey with more than 60,000 respondents. Survey responses indicate that academics identify with both their geographical local units (‘polis’) and their more transnational epistemic or scholarly communities (‘cosmos’). Identification with scholarly communities tends to be strongest. We embed the survey results in the academic literature by proposing a theoretical understanding of academics’ ‘local context’ based on Beck’s notion of cosmopolitanism and Durkheim’s concept of solidarity. We conclude with considerations on how to successfully implement research integrity policies.

Funder

European Union

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference59 articles.

1. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity—Revised Edition;ALLEA,2017

2. Content, Contribution, and Knowledge Consumption: Uncovering Hidden Topic Structure and Rhetorical Signals in Scientific Texts;Antons;Journal of Management,2019

3. The Replicability Crisis and Public Trust in Psychological Science;Anvari;Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology,2018

4. Que Des Réseaux! Compte Rendu de Caroline Wagner. The New Invisible College. Science for Development. Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 2008;Arvanitis;Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3