Abstract
AbstractTeacher self-efficacy (TSE) of pre-service and in-service teachers plays a significant role in the successful implementation of educational reforms. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to explore the interaction between curriculum and/or assessment reform and TSE. Twenty-nine empirical research studies are analysed to find factors that impact TSE during change and the support mechanisms necessary to maintain high TSE. Using the Systematic Quantitative Literature Review method coupled with Social Cognitive Theory and Sources of Self-efficacy, studies reported that environmental determinants lower TSE during reform. It was found that to support high TSE professional learning was a necessity.
Funder
Queensland University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Koniewski, M. (2019). The teacher self-efficacy scale (TSES) factorial structure evidence review and new evidence from Polish-speaking samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(6), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000475
2. Andersen, A. M., Dragsted, S., Evans, R. H., & Sørensen, H. (2017). the relationship between changes in teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and the science teaching environment of danish first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000031461.68912.3d
3. Bandura, A. (1986b). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
4. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-efficacy beliefs of Adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献