Identifying key ethical debates for autonomous robots in agri-food: a research agenda

Author:

Ryan MarkORCID,van der Burg Simone,Bogaardt Marc-Jeroen

Abstract

AbstractAgribusinesses are investing in different forms of AI robots, as there is a lot of hope that these machines will help meet the challenges within the agricultural industry, which is to efficiently produce more food for a growing world population. AI robots are expected to enhance production, while compensating for lack of manpower, reducing production costs, taking over unattractive (risky, heavy, and dirty) jobs and reducing the burden of food production on the environment. In spite of these promises, however, AI robots for agri-food also give rise to ethical questions and concerns, which have been little researched and discussed until now. To fill this gap, we developed a research agenda for future research in this area. To do this, we opened our analysis to focus on ethics AI robots generally to specifically identify which of these issues are most relevant to agro-robots. The question we want to find an answer to is: what are the most relevant ethical questions raised about AI robots for robots developed for the agri-food sector? And which questions are not mentioned in the literature, which are particularly relevant for agro-robots? Our paper will provide an overview over the key issues and areas which deserve further elaboration to come to a more mature ethics of AI agro-robots.

Funder

ministerie van onderwijs, cultuur en wetenschap

h2020 fast track to innovation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference86 articles.

1. AWTI: Adviesraad voor Wetenschap, Technologie en Innovatie.: Klaar voor de toekomst? Naar een brede strategie voor ICT, ISBN: 9789077005736, (2015)

2. Allen, C., Varner, G., Zinser, J.: Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 12(3), 251–261 (2000)

3. Allen, C., Wallach, W., Smit, I.: Why machine ethics? IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 12–17 (2006)

4. Al-Razgan, M., AlFallaj, L.F., AlSarhani, N.S., AlOmair, H.W.: Systematic review of robotics use since 2005. Internat. J. Mech. Eng. Robotics Res. 5, 129 (2016)

5. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Toward ensuring ethical behavior from autonomous systems: a case-supported principle-based paradigm. Indust. Robot. An Internat. J. (2015)

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3