Abstract
AbstractThe global agricultural sector faces a significant number of challenges for a sustainable future, and one of the tools proposed to address these challenges is the use of automation in agriculture. In particular, robotic systems for agricultural tasks are being designed, tested, and increasingly commercialised in many countries. Much touted as an environmentally beneficial technology with the ability to improve data management and reduce the use of chemical inputs while improving yields and addressing labour shortages, agricultural robotics also presents a number of potential ethical challenges – including rural unemployment, the amplification of economic and digital inequalities, and entrenching unsustainable farming practices. As such, development is not uncontroversial, and there have been calls for a responsible approach to their innovation that integrates more substantive inclusion into development processes. This study investigates current approaches to participation and inclusion amongst United Kingdom (UK) agricultural robotics developers. Through semi-structured interviews with key members of the UK agricultural robotics sector, we analyse the stakeholder engagement currently integrated into development processes. We explore who is included, how inclusion is done, and what the inclusion is done for. We reflect on how these findings align with the current literature on stakeholder inclusion in agricultural technology development, and suggest what they could mean for the development of more substantive responsible innovation in agricultural robotics.
Funder
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference117 articles.
1. Adamides, G. et al. 2017. Design and development of a semi-autonomous agricultural vineyard sprayer: Human–robot interaction aspects. Journal of Field Robotics, 34(8): 1407–1426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21721.
2. Agri-EPI Centre and Hands Free Farm 2022. Safe-tech Hackathon: Enhancing the safety and security of autonomous agricultural vehicles. Available at: https://agri-epicentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Hackathon-whitepaper.pdf (Accessed: 25 January 2023).
3. Ahmadi, A. et al. 2019. Comparing and combining Social Network Analysis and Stakeholder Analysis for natural resource governance. Environmental Development, 32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.07.001.
4. Alexander, C.S., M. Yarborough, and A Smith. 2023. ‘Who is responsible for “responsible AI”?: Navigating challenges to build trust in AI agriculture and food system technology. Precision Agriculture [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10063-3.
5. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4):216–224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献