Author:
Nichols Kim,Burgh Gilbert,Kennedy Callie
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Abd-el-khalick, F. (2008). Modeling science classrooms after scientific laboratories. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 80–85). Rotterdam: Sense.
2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014a). Australian Curriculum: critical and creative thinking. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/GeneralCapabilities/Pdf/Critical-and-creative-thinking .
3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014b). Australian Curriculum: science. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science/curriculum/f-10?layout=1 .
4. Baumfield, V. (2006). Tools for pedagogical inquiry: the impact of teaching thinking skills on teachers. Oxford Review of Education, 32(2), 185–196.
5. Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability: a quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 84, 577–610.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献