Abstract
AbstractSafety assurance of automated driving systems must consider uncertain environment perception. This paper reviews literature addressing how perception testing is realized as part of safety assurance. The paper focuses on testing for verification and validation purposes at the interface between perception and planning, and structures the analysis along the three axes (1) test criteria and metrics, (2) test scenarios, and (3) reference data. Furthermore, the analyzed literature includes related safety standards, safety-independent perception algorithm benchmarking, and sensor modeling. It is found that the realization of safety-oriented perception testing remains an open issue since challenges concerning the three testing axes and their interdependencies currently do not appear to be sufficiently solved.
Funder
Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Energie
University Library RWTH Aachen University
RWTH Aachen University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference178 articles.
1. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation (J3016) (2018)
2. Dietmayer, K.C.J., Reuter, S., Nuss, D.: Representation of fused environment data, pp. 1–30. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09840-1_25-1
3. Dietmayer, K.: Predicting of machine perception for automated driving. In: Autonomous Driving, pp. 407–424. Springer, New York (2016)
4. Stellet, J.E., Zofka, M.R., Schumacher, J., Schamm, T., Niewels, F., Zöllner, J.M.: Testing of advanced driver assistance towards automated driving: A survey and taxonomy on existing approaches and open questions. In: IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1455–1462. IEEE (2015)
5. Amersbach, C., Winner, H.: Functional decomposition: An approach to reduce the approval effort for highly automated driving. In: 8. Tagung Fahrerassistenz. Technical University of Munich, Munich (2017)
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献