Design and Implementation of an Automated Classroom Analytics System: Stakeholder Engagement and Mapping
-
Published:2023-11
Issue:6
Volume:67
Page:945-954
-
ISSN:8756-3894
-
Container-title:TechTrends
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:TechTrends
Author:
Baran EvrimORCID, AlZoubi Dana, Morales Anasilvia Salazar
Abstract
AbstractComputational analysis methods and machine learning techniques introduce innovative ways to capture classroom interactions and display data on analytics dashboards. Automated classroom analytics employ advanced data analysis, providing educators with comprehensive insights into student participation, engagement, and behavioral trends within classroom settings. Through the provision of context-sensitive feedback, automated classroom analytics systems can be integrated into the evidence-based pedagogical decision-making and reflective practice processes of faculty members in higher education institutions. This paper presents TEACHActive, an automated classroom analytics system, by detailing its design and implementation. It outlines the processes of stakeholder engagement and mapping, elucidates the benefits and obstacles associated with a comprehensive classroom analytics system design, and concludes by discussing significant implications. These implications propose user-centric design approaches for higher education researchers and practitioners to consider.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Education
Reference31 articles.
1. Ahuja, K., Kim, D., Xhakaj, F., Varga, V., Xie, A., Zhang, S., Townsend, J. E., Harrison, C., Ogan, A., & Agarwal, Y. (2019). EduSense: Practical Classroom Sensing at Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 3(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351229 2. AlZoubi, D., Kelley, K., Baran, E., Gilbert, S. B., & Karabulut Ilgu, A. & Jiang, S. (2021a). TEACHActive feedback dashboard: Using automated classroom analytics to visualize pedagogical strategies at a glance. In CHI conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts (pp. 1–6), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451709 3. AlZoubi, D., Kelley, J., Baran, E., Gilbert, S.B. , Jiang, S., & Karabulut-Ilgu, A. (2021b). Designing the TEACHActive feedback dashboard: A human centered approach. In: Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK21) Online. 4. Avella, J. T., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S. G., & Kanai, T. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2), 13–29. 5. Avramides, K., Hunter, J., Oliver, M., & Luckin, R. (2015). A method for teacher inquiry in cross‐curricular projects: Lessons from a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12233
|
|