Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The study’s objective is to assess the environmental performance of rice production in Northern Italy, in particular in Piedmont, the first Italian and European district for the rice-growing area, and thus identify the most critical hotspots and agricultural processes. In particular, as a case study, a farm located in Vercelli (VC) has been chosen. Subsequently, the study results were compared with other different cultivation practices to evaluate the most sustainable choice.
Methods
The application of the LCA has been performed, highlighting the phases of rice production that have the most significant impact. Then, uncertainty and sensitivity analyses have been made to estimate the robustness of the results and assess the influence of changing some input variables on emission reduction. Finally, multivariate statistical, specifically a principal component analysis (PCA), was conducted to aid the interpretation of the output dataset of this case study. LCA, uncertainty analysis, and sensitivity analysis were performed with SimaPro 9.2.0, using ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) methodology, and PCA with R software.
Results and discussions
The hotspot with the highest environmental load is irrigation, which compared to the other phases impacts more in 15 out of 18 categories, including 12 with impacts greater than + 75%. This is because irrigation causes direct impacts, related to the methanogenesis in rice fields, but also indirect impacts related mainly to the production of the energy mix required to move the large masses of irrigation water. Therefore, different water management systems were compared and results show that the irrigation systems based on intermittent paddy submergence (DSI) could result in − 40% lower impacts, resulting to be the preferable technique over the other irrigation systems analyzed, including the traditional one used in this study.
Conclusions
In order to reduce the environmental impacts related to the irrigation process, a water management system characterized by intermittent flooding of the paddy field (DSI) could be used as it reduces the environmental impacts the most (− 40%), while the least suitable system is one characterized by continuous flooding without drought periods, as it causes the highest impacts.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science
Reference62 articles.
1. Abdul Rahman MH, Chen SS, Abdul Razak PR, Abu Bakar NA, Shahrun MS, Zin Zawawi N, Abdul Talib SA (2019) Life cycle assessment in conventional rice farming system: estimation of greenhouse gas emissions using cradle-to-gate approach. J Clean Prod 212:1526–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.062
2. Abruzzese A, Albertario E, Beltarre G et al (2014) Gestione della risorsa irrigua. Fondo per la promozione di accordi istituzionali “Piattaforma di biotecnologie verdi e di tecniche gestionali per un sistema agricolo ad elevata sostenibilità ambientale”. Available online at: http://www.biogesteca.unimi.it/Gestione%20della%20risorsa%20irrigua.pdf. Accessed 7 Dec 2021
3. Ahmadi MA (2018) Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Shale Oil Reservoirs. Fundamentals of enhanced oil and gas recovery from conventional and unconventional reservoirs 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813027-8.00009-6
4. Aziz NIHA, Hanafiah MM (2020) Life cycle analysis of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent. Renew Energy 145:847–857
5. Bacenetti J, Fusi A, Negri M, Bocchi S, Fiala M (2016) Organic production systems: sustainability assessment of rice in Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.046
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献