Author:
Strobel Anja,Franke-Bartholdt Luise,Püttner Ingo,Kersting Martin
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Reference39 articles.
1. Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 291–304.
2. Arbeitskreis Assessment Center e.V. (2008). Interview-Standards.
http://www.arbeitskreis-ac.de/attachments/149_akac-interview-standards.pdf
(Zugriff: 03.12.2015).
3. Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S. W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1394–1411.
4. Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702.
5. Chapman, D. S., & Zweig, D. I. (2005). Developing a nomological network for interview structure: Antecedents and consequences of the structured selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 58, 673–702.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Personalauswahl;Recrutainment;2023
2. Eignungsdiagnostische Interviews im internationalen Kontext;Eignungsdiagnostische Interviews;2023
3. Auswahl und Kompetenzdiagnostik;Talent- und Kompetenzmanagement;2021
4. Diagnostische Verfahren;Psychologische Diagnostik;2021