Author:
Albert Marie-Noëlle,Lazzari Dodeler Nadia,Ohin Asri Yves
Abstract
AbstractThe concept of community of persons, which focuses on both persons and the whole, helps understand solidarity. The latter is based on the social nature of persons. Community of persons and solidarity seems to be able to move away from the individualist perspective or the individualism-collectivism dichotomy. Using autopraxeography in a pragmatic constructivism epistemological paradigm, this article aims to explore how organizations can develop solidarity in a workplace. The experience presented takes place in a bank. It shows that communities of persons with employees and customers are both ethical and financially efficient. These communities build a dialogue between persons and organizations. Nevertheless, it is impossible to force solidarity because it could generate derision that is contrary to the wished goal. Finally, while this model is based on solidarity, it focuses solely on internal solidarity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Albert, Marie-Noëlle, and Nadia Lazzari Dodeler. 2022. From an association of individuals to communities of persons: how to foster complexity to understand diversity in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management 35.
2. Albert, Marie-Noëlle, and Nancy Michaud. 2016. From disillusion to the development of professional judgment: Experience of the implementation process of a human complexity course. SAGE Open 6 (4): 1–13.
3. Albert, Marie-Noëlle, and Jean-Pierre Perouma. 2017. The dialogue: an essential component to consider “organization as a community of persons”. Humanistic Management Journal 2 (1): 37–55.
4. Arjoon, Surenda. Alvaro Turriago-Hoyos, and Ulf Thoene. 2018. Virtuousness and the common good as a conceptual framework for harmonizing the goals of the individual, organizations, and the economy. Journal of Business Ethics 147 (1): 143–163.
5. Avenier, Marie-José, and Catherine Thomas. 2015. Finding one’s way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks. Systemes d’ information management 20 (1): 61–98.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献