Re/Thinking the Nature of Technology in Science Classrooms-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Re/Thinking the Nature of Technology in Science Classrooms

Published:2015-11-19 Issue:2 Volume:47 Page:169-187
ISSN:0826-4805
Container-title:Interchange
language:en
Short-container-title:Interchange

Author:

Kim Mijung,Roth Wolff-Michael

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,General Social Sciences,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10780-015-9273-3.pdf

Reference52 articles.

1. Bennett, D., & Monahan, P. (2013). NYSCI design lag: No bored kids! In M. Honey & D. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators (pp. 34–49). New York, NY: Routledge.

2. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P–12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387.

3. Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132–161). London: Routledge.

4. Carr, R., Bennett, L., & Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K-12 STEM standards of the 50 U.S. States: An analysis of presence and extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 539–564.

5. Cavanagh, S., & Trotter, A. (2008). Where is the ‘T’ in STEM? Education Week, 27, 17–19.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cybersecurity Education Across the Middle and High School Curricula;Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership;2024-03-08

2. Science teacher’s perceptions of the nature of technology: a Q-methodology study;International Journal of Technology and Design Education;2021-11-05

3. Self-efficacy and (vocational) interest in technology and design: an empirical study in seventh and eighth-grade classrooms;International Journal of Technology and Design Education;2018-11-07