1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2000). Middle grades mathematics textbooks: A benchmarks-based evaluation. Retrieved from
http://www.project2061.org/publications/textbook/mgmth/report/default.htm
.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2002). Middle grades science textbooks: A benchmarks-based evaluation. Retrieved from
http://www.project2061.org/publications/textbook/mgsci/report/crit-used.htm
.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (n. d.). Project 2061: Middle and high school science textbooks a standards-based evaluation. Retrieved from
http://www.project2061.org/events/meetings/textbook/literacy/cdrom/CRITERIA/CRITERIA.HTM
.
4. Apple, M. W. (1990). Is there a curriculum voice to reclaim? The Phi Delta Kappan, 71(7), 526–530.
5. Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2015a). Interacting with a suite of educative features: Elementary science teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. doi:
10.1002/tea.21250
.