Abstract
AbstractWe present a new experimental method that measures the compressibility of phenotype-specific cell populations. This is done by performing statistical analysis of the cell counts from the outlets of an acoustophoresis chip as a function of the increasing actuator voltage (i.e. acoustic energy density) during acoustophoretic separation. The theoretical separation performance curve, henceforth, Side-Stream Recovery ($$\mathrm {SSR}$$
SSR
), vs the piezo-actuator voltage (V) is derived by moment analysis of a one-dimensional model of acoustophoresis separation, accounting for distributions of the cell or microparticle properties and the system parameters (hydrodynamics, radiation force, drag enhancement, and acoustic streaming). The acoustophoretic device is calibrated with polymer microbeads of known properties by fitting the experimental $$\mathrm {SSR}$$
SSR
with the theoretical $$\mathrm {SSR}$$
SSR
, in which the acoustic energy density is considered proportional to the squared voltage, i.e. $$E_\mathrm {ac}^{}=\alpha \,V^2_{}$$
E
ac
=
α
V
2
. The fitting parameter $$\alpha$$
α
for the calibration procedure is the device effectivity, reflecting the efficiency in performing acoustophoretic microparticle displacement. Once calibrated, the compressibility of unknown cells is estimated by fitting experimental $$\mathrm {SSR}$$
SSR
cell data points with the theoretical $$\mathrm {SSR}$$
SSR
curve. In this procedure, the microparticle compressibility is the fitting parameter. The method is applied to estimate the compressibility of a variety of cell populations showing its utility in terms of rapid analysis and need for minute sample amounts.
Funder
FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions
Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning
Barncancerfonden
VINNOVA
Vetenskapsrådet
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Condensed Matter Physics,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Reference43 articles.
1. Alnaimat F, Dagher S, Mathew B, Hilal-Alnqbi A, Khashan S (2018) Microfluidics based magnetophoresis a review. Chem Rec 18(11):1596–1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201800018
2. Antfolk M, Laurell T (2017) Continuous flow microfluidic separation and processing of rare cells and bioparticles found in blood—a review. Anal Chim Acta 965:9–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.02.017. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003267017302337
3. Araujo AB, Angeli MH, Dias Salton G, Monteiro Furlan J, Schmalfuss T, Röhsig LM (2017) Absolute density of different sources of hematopoietic progenitor cells: bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cell and umbilical cord blood. Hematop Stem Cells. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.10.002
4. Augustsson P, Barnkob R, Grenvall C, Deierborg T, Brundin Bruus H, Laurell T (2010) Measuring the acoustophoretic contrast factor of living cells in microchannels. Proceedings of the 14. International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciencesp pp. 1337–1339
5. Augustsson P, Karlsen JT, Su HW, Bruus H, Voldman J (2016) Iso-acoustic focusing of cells for size-insensitive acousto-mechanical phenotyping. Nat Commun 7(1):11556. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11556. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11556
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献