Abstract
Abstract
Key message
Established spatial models improve the analysis of agricultural field trials with or without genomic data and can be fitted with the open-source R package INLA.
Abstract
The objective of this paper was to fit different established spatial models for analysing agricultural field trials using the open-source R package INLA. Spatial variation is common in field trials, and accounting for it increases the accuracy of estimated genetic effects. However, this is still hindered by the lack of available software implementations. We compare some established spatial models and show possibilities for flexible modelling with respect to field trial design and joint modelling over multiple years and locations. We use a Bayesian framework and for statistical inference the integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) implemented in the R package INLA. The spatial models we use are the well-known independent row and column effects, separable first-order autoregressive ($$\mathrm{AR1} \otimes \mathrm{AR1}$$
AR
1
⊗
AR
1
) models and a Gaussian random field (Matérn) model that is approximated via the stochastic partial differential equation approach. The Matérn model can accommodate flexible field trial designs and yields interpretable parameters. We test the models in a simulation study imitating a wheat breeding programme with different levels of spatial variation, with and without genome-wide markers and with combining data over two locations, modelling spatial and genetic effects jointly. The results show comparable predictive performance for both the $$\mathrm{AR1} \otimes \mathrm{AR1}$$
AR
1
⊗
AR
1
and the Matérn models. We also present an example of fitting the models to a real wheat breeding data and simulated tree breeding data with the Nelder wheel design to show the flexibility of the Matérn model and the R package INLA.
Funder
The Research Council of Norway
The UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,General Medicine,Biotechnology
Reference51 articles.
1. Archbold D, Brown G, Cornelius P (1987) Rootstock and in-row spacing effects on growth and yield of spur-type delicious and golden delicious apple. J Am Soc Hortic Sci (USA) 112:219–222
2. Bakka H, Rue H, Fuglstad GA, Riebler A, Bolin D, Illian J, Krainski E, Simpson D, Lindgren F (2018) Spatial modeling with R-INLA: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 10(6):e1443.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1443
3. Bakka H, Vanhatalo J, Illian JB, Simpson D, Rue H (2019) Non-stationary Gaussian models with physical barriers. Spat Stat 29:268–288
4. Bernal-Vasquez AM, Möhring J, Schmidt M, Schönleben M, Schön CC, Piepho HP (2014) The importance of phenotypic data analysis for genomic prediction: a case study comparing different spatial models in rye. BMC Genom 15(1):646.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-646
5. Besag J, Higdon D (1999) Bayesian analysis of agricultural field experiments. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 61(4):691–746
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献