Abstract
AbstractThe increasing precision of observations of the large-scale structure of the universe has created a problem for simulators: running the simulations necessary to interpret these observations has become impractical. Simulators have thus turned to machine learning (ML) algorithms instead. Though ML decreases computational expense, one might be worried about the use of ML for scientific investigations: How can algorithms that have repeatedly been described as black-boxes deliver scientific understanding? In this paper, I investigate how cosmologists employ ML, arguing that in this context, ML algorithms should not be considered black-boxes and can deliver genuine scientific understanding. Accordingly, understanding the methodological role of ML algorithms is crucial to understanding the types of questions they are capable of, and ought to be responsible for, answering.
Funder
John Templeton Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Agarwal, S., Abdalla, F. B., et al. (2012). PkANN - I. Non-linear matter power spectrum interpolation through artificial neural networks. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 424(2), 1409–1418.
2. Agarwal, S., Abdalla, F. B., et al. (2014). PkANN – II. A non-linear matter power spectrum interpolator developed using artificial neural networks, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 439(2), 2102–2121.
3. Ashby, W. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. University paperbacks: Chapman & Hall.
4. Batilo, A. (2015). Everything you need to know about artificial neural networks. Medium: technology, invention, app, and more. https://medium.com/technology-invention-and-more/everything-you-need-to-know-about-artificial-neural-networks-57fac18245a1.
5. Batterman, R. W. (1992). Explanatory instability. Noûs, 26(3), 325–348.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献