Abstract
AbstractThis paper develops a novel, functionalist, unified account of the epistemic normativity of reasoning. On this view, epistemic norms drop out of epistemic functions. I argue that practical reasoning serves a prudential function of generating prudentially permissible action, and the epistemic function of generating knowledge of what one ought to do. This picture, if right, goes a long way towards normatively divorcing action and practical reasoning. At the same time, it unifies reasoning epistemically: practical and theoretical reasoning will turn out to be governed by the same epistemic norm—knowledge—in virtue of serving the same epistemic function: generating knowledge of the conclusion.
Funder
Mind Association
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference46 articles.
1. Benton, M. (2014). Knowledge Norms. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
2. Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
3. Broome, J. (2013). Rationality through reasoning. Wiley-Blackwell.
4. Brown, J. (2010). Knowledge and Assertion. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 549–566.
5. Brown, J. (2012). Assertion and practical reasoning: Common or divergent epistemic standards? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84(1), 123–157.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A Theory of Moral Fictionalism;Morality: From Error to Fiction;2024-08-29
2. After Error Theory: The “What Next?” Question;Morality: From Error to Fiction;2024-08-29
3. Defenses of Moral Error Theory;Morality: From Error to Fiction;2024-08-29
4. The Argument from Moral Responsibility;Morality: From Error to Fiction;2024-08-29
5. The Naturalist’s Case for Error Theory;Morality: From Error to Fiction;2024-08-29