Serious theories and skeptical theories: Why you are probably not a brain in a vat-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Serious theories and skeptical theories: Why you are probably not a brain in a vat

Published:2015-08-22 Issue:4 Volume:173 Page:1031-1052
ISSN:0031-8116
Container-title:Philosophical Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:Philos Stud

Author:

Huemer Michael

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11098-015-0539-5.pdf

Reference25 articles.

1. Beebe, J. (2009). The abductivist reply to skepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79, 605–636.

2. BonJour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

3. Carnap, R. (1962). Logical foundations of probability (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4. Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (Eds.), The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Dretske, F. (1981). The pragmatic dimension of knowledge. Philosophical Studies, 40, 363–378.

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Verschwörungstheorien und skeptische Hypothesen: immun gegen Gegenbelege?;Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung;2024-09-01

2. Conclusion;Naturalism Beyond the Limits of Science;2023-08-13

3. Metaphysics Unmoored?;Naturalism Beyond the Limits of Science;2023-08-13

4. Context Dependence in Scientific Methodology;Naturalism Beyond the Limits of Science;2023-08-13

5. Case Study;Naturalism Beyond the Limits of Science;2023-08-13