Abstract
AbstractThe current literature on norms of inquiry features two families of norms: norms that focus on an inquirer’s ignorance and norms that focus on the question’s soundness. I argue that, given a factive conception of ignorance, it’s possible to derive a soundness-style norm from a version of the ignorance norm. A crucial lemma in the argument is that just as one can only be ignorant of a proposition if the proposition is true, so one can only be ignorant with respect to a question if the question is sound.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Archer, A. (2018). Wondering about what you know. Analysis, 78(4), 596–604.
2. Archer, A. (2021). The aim of inquiry. Disputatio, 13(6), 95–119.
3. Chisholm, R., & Sosa, E. (1966). On the logic of “intrinsically better.” American Philosophical Quarterly, 3(3), 244–249.
4. Falbo, A. (2021). Inquiry and confirmation. Analysis, 81(4), 622–631.
5. Falbo, A. (2023). Inquiring minds want to improve. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 101(2), 298–312.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Inquiry for the mistaken and confused;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2024-07-18