Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy Brown University USA
Abstract
Abstract
A puzzle arises when combining two individually plausible, yet jointly incompatible, norms of inquiry. On the one hand, it seems that one should not inquire into a question while believing an answer to that question. But, on the other hand, it seems rational to inquire into a question while believing its answer, if one is seeking confirmation. Millson (2021), who has recently identified this puzzle, suggests a possible solution, though he notes that it comes with significant costs. I offer an alternative solution, which does not involve these costs. The best way to resolve the puzzle is to reject the prohibition on inquiring into a question while believing an answer to it. Resolving the puzzle in this way makes salient two fruitful areas in the epistemology of inquiry that merit further investigation. The first concerns the nature of the inquiring attitudes and the second concerns the aim(s) of inquiry. Keywords: inquiry, confirmation, norms of inquiry, inquiring attitudes, aims
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference56 articles.
1. Wondering about what you know;Archer;Analysis,2018
2. Negative bias in polar questions;Asher;Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung,2005
3. The toxin and the dogmatist;Beddor;Australasian Journal of Philosophy,2019
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献