The possible influence of third-order shim coils on gradient–magnet interactions: an inter-field and inter-site study
-
Published:2024-01-10
Issue:2
Volume:37
Page:169-183
-
ISSN:1352-8661
-
Container-title:Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Magn Reson Mater Phy
Author:
Boulant NicolasORCID, Le Ster Caroline, Amadon Alexis, Aubert Guy, Beckett Alexander, Belorgey Jean, Bonnelye Cédric, Bosch Dario, Brunner David Otto, Dilasser Guillaume, Dubois Olivier, Ehses Philipp, Feinberg David, Feizollah Sajjad, Gras Vincent, Gross Simon, Guihard Quentin, Lannou Hervé, Le Bihan Denis, Mauconduit Franck, Molinié Frédéric, Nunio François, Pruessmann Klaas, Quettier Lionel, Scheffler Klaus, Stöcker Tony, Tardif Christine, Ugurbil Kamil, Vignaud Alexandre, Vu An, Wu Xiaoping
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To assess the possible influence of third-order shim coils on the behavior of the gradient field and in gradient–magnet interactions at 7 T and above.
Materials and methods
Gradient impulse response function measurements were performed at 5 sites spanning field strengths from 7 to 11.7 T, all of them sharing the same exact whole-body gradient coil design. Mechanical fixation and boundary conditions of the gradient coil were altered in several ways at one site to study the impact of mechanical coupling with the magnet on the field perturbations. Vibrations, power deposition in the He bath, and field dynamics were characterized at 11.7 T with the third-order shim coils connected and disconnected inside the Faraday cage.
Results
For the same whole-body gradient coil design, all measurements differed greatly based on the third-order shim coil configuration (connected or not). Vibrations and gradient transfer function peaks could be affected by a factor of 2 or more, depending on the resonances. Disconnecting the third-order shim coils at 11.7 T also suppressed almost completely power deposition peaks at some frequencies.
Discussion
Third-order shim coil configurations can have major impact in gradient–magnet interactions with consequences on potential hardware damage, magnet heating, and image quality going beyond EPI acquisitions.
Funder
H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies Agence Nationale de la Recherche Fondation Leducq National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Choi CH, Webb A, Orzada S, Kelenjeridze M, Shah JN, Felder J (2023) A review of parallel transmit arrays for ultra-high field MR imaging. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2023.3244132 2. Turner R (1993) Gradient coil design: a review of methods. Magn Reson Imag 11:903–920 3. Foo TKF, Ek TT, Vermilyea ME, Hua Y, Fiveland E, Piel JE, Park K, Ricci J, Thompson PS, Graziani D, Conte G, Kagan A, Bai Y, Vasil C, Tarasek M, Yeo DTB, Snell F, Lee D, Dean A, De Marco JK, Shih RY, Hood MN, Chae H, Ho VB (2020) Highly efficient head-only magnetic field insert gradient coil for achieving simultaneous high gradient amplitude and slew rate at 3.0T (MAGNUS) for brain microstructure imaging. Magn Reson Med 83:2356–2369 4. Feinberg DA, Beckett AJS, Vu AT, Stockmann J, Huber L, Ma S, Ahn S, Setsompop K, Cao X, Park S, Liu C, Wald LL, Polimeni JR, Mareyam A, Gruber B, Stirnberg R, Liao C, Yacoub E, Davids M, Bell P, Rummert E, Koehler M, Potthast A, Gonzalez-Insua I, Stocker S, Gunamony S, Dietz P (2023) Next-generation MRI scanner designed for ultra-high-resolution human brain imaging at 7 Tesla. Nat Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-02068-7 5. Schmitt F, Nowak S, Eberlein E (2020) An attempt to reconstruct the History of gradient-system technology at Siemens. MAGNETOM Flash (77) 2/2020. http://clinical-mri.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Schmitt_Gradient_Development_ISMRM_2020.pdf
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|