Space Invaders: Pedestrian Proxemic Utility Functions and Trust Zones for Autonomous Vehicle Interactions

Author:

Camara FantaORCID,Fox CharlesORCID

Abstract

AbstractUnderstanding pedestrian proxemic utility and trust will help autonomous vehicles to plan and control interactions with pedestrians more safely and efficiently. When pedestrians cross the road in front of human-driven vehicles, the two agents use knowledge of each other’s preferences to negotiate and to determine who will yield to the other. Autonomous vehicles will require similar understandings, but previous work has shown a need for them to be provided in the form of continuous proxemic utility functions, which are not available from previous proxemics studies based on Hall’s discrete zones. To fill this gap, a new Bayesian method to infer continuous pedestrian proxemic utility functions is proposed, and related to a new definition of ‘physical trust requirement’ (PTR) for road-crossing scenarios. The method is validated on simulation data then its parameters are inferred empirically from two public datasets. Results show that pedestrian proxemic utility is best described by a hyperbolic function, and that trust by the pedestrian is required in a discrete ‘trust zone’ which emerges naturally from simple physics. The PTR concept is then shown to be capable of generating and explaining the empirically observed zone sizes of Hall’s discrete theory of proxemics.

Funder

EU H2020 Project interACT

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Computer Science,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Social Psychology

Reference84 articles.

1. Abou-Zeid M, Ben-Akiva M, Bierlaire M, Choudhury C, Hess S (2011) Attitudes and value of time heterogeneity. In: 90th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board

2. Agrigoroaie R, Tapus A (2019) Cognitive performance and physiological response analysis. Int J Soc Robot 12:1–18

3. Asghari Oskoei M, Walters M, Dautenhahn K (2010) An autonomous proxemic system for a mobile companion robot. In: Proceedings of the AISB 2010 symposium on new frontiers for human robot interaction. AISB

4. Basu C, Singhal M (2016) Trust dynamics in human autonomous vehicle interaction: a review of trust models. In: 2016 AAAI spring symposium series

5. Batley R, Bates J, Bliemer M, Börjesson M, Bourdon J, Cabral MO, Chintakayala PK, Choudhury C, Daly A, Dekker T et al (2019) New appraisal values of travel time saving and reliability in Great Britain. Transportation 46(3):583–621

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3