Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide Australia
2. Public Health Research Unit, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Women’s and Children’s Health Network, Adelaide Australia
Abstract
Purpose Waterproof casts have been shown to provide adequate support and immobilization in fractures. This study evaluated two waterproof cast liners, namely, Wet or Dry® and Delta Dry®, in terms of ease of application/removal, durability, longevity, and patient satisfaction using patient- and technician-reported outcome measures. Methods A total of 105 children were enrolled in a randomized trial and received a below-elbow synthetic cast with either of the two cast liners. Results The two groups were comparable with regards to age, gender, side of cast, and hand dominance. Assessment was carried out at application and removal. In the patient-reported outcomes, the Wet or Dry® group was rated significantly better in the odor and water resistance categories. In the technician-reported application and removal outcome measures, the Delta Dry® group was rated significantly higher. Conclusions The use of waterproof cast liners appears to be safe in children with forearm fractures, with some differences in outcome between the two products trialed.
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献