Traditional Versus Water-resistant Short Leg Casting: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Author:

Carveth Stephen L.,Bomar James D.,Scott MaryLou,Rickert Kathleen D.,Upasani Vidyadhar V.

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing fiberglass short leg casts with traditional cast padding to similar casts with water-resistant cast padding and recorded the opinion of the patient/caregiver and Orthopaedic Technicians (Ortho Techs) that applied and removed the casts. Methods: Subjects with an injury that would be treated with a short leg cast were enrolled and randomized into a traditional cast or a water-resistant cast. Following cast application, the Ortho Tech that applied the cast completed a questionnaire asking their opinion on ease of application, moldability, padding level, and time taken for application. Following the removal of the study cast, the Ortho Tech that removed the cast completed a questionnaire that included an assessment of skin condition and evidence of the patient poking items inside the cast, as well as their opinion of ease of padding removal, padding durability and longevity, and an overall quality assessment of the cast padding. Following cast removal, the patient (or caregiver) also completed a questionnaire asking for their assessment of comfort, the weight of the cast, itchiness, heat/sweat, smell, and satisfaction. Patients who were treated with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene cast were also asked about their happiness with the cast’s water resistance and asked how long the cast took to dry. Results: Sixty patients were included in this study, thirty in each group. The water-resistant casts took longer to apply than the traditional casts (12.4±4.0 vs. 8.2±3.2 min, P<0.001). The Ortho Techs favored the traditional cast when it came to ease of application (P<0.001), moldability (P=0.003), ease of padding removal (P<0.001), padding durability (P=0.006), padding longevity (P=0.005), and their overall impression (P=0.014). The patients/caregivers responded similarly among the 2 groups for each survey question. Conclusions: Patients randomized into each cast type tolerated their cast similarly; however, the Ortho Techs involved in this study preferred the traditional cast.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3