1. Arcavi, A., & Hadas, N. (2000). Computer mediated learning: An example of an approach. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(1), 25–45.
2. Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2009). Conjecturing and proving in dynamic geometry: The elaboration of some research hypotheses. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on European Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 231–240). Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique. Retrieved December 30, 2018, from http://ife.ens-lyon.fr/publications/edition-electronique/cerme6/wg2-06-baccaglini-frank.pdf
3. Baccaglini-Frank, A., Mariotti, M. A., & Antonini, S. (2009). Different perceptions of invariants and generality of proof in dynamic geometry. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 89–96). Psychology of Mathematics Education. Retrieved December 30, 2018, from http://lettredelapreuve.org/pdf/PME33/baccaglini.pdf
4. Battista, M. T. (2008a). Representations and cognitive objects in modern school geometry. In G. W. Blume & K. M. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Cases and perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 341–362). Information Age Publishing IAP Inc.
5. Battista, M. T. (2008b). Development of the Shape Makers geometry microworld: Design principles and research. In G. W. Blume & M. K. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Cases and perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 131–156). Information Age Publishing (IAP) Inc.