Continuing Evolution of Research on Teaching and Learning: Exploring Emerging Methods for Unpacking Research on Teachers, Teaching, and Learning

Author:

Orrill Chandra HawleyORCID,Gearty ZarinaORCID,Wang KunORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn this chapter, we consider current trends in mathematics education research to highlight the ways in which Medley’s framework is still relevant. In the three decades since Medley’s original framework was presented, research has continued to change. This chapter provides an overview of some of these changes and the implications they have for applying Medley’s framework to learning environments. To this end, we begin by discussing methodologies that have become more widespread. We then explore examples of research methods that offer new ways of thinking about research questions related to teaching and learning in formal environments, thus allowing researchers to look across the variables in ways that were unavailable until recently. We then discuss some of the opportunities created by technology. These have changed the ways we collect data and the data we collect. We close by discussing how the changes discussed in this chapter specifically relate to presage-process–product research. Our goal in this chapter is not to present a comprehensive review of the literature, rather, we seek to highlight both where the field is now in terms of research methods and tools as well as to provide examples of the ways in which Medley’s framework is being pursued in newer research.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference124 articles.

1. Andra, C., Lindstrom, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 237–259.

2. Arastoopour, G., Chesler, N. C., D’Angelo, C. M., Opgenorth, J. W., Reardan, C. B., Haggerty, N. P., Lepak, C., & Shaffer, D. W. (2012). Nephrotex: Measuring first year student’s ways of professional thinking in a virtual internship  [Paper presentation]. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX. Paper No. AC 2012–3103.

3. Baker, F. R. (2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd ed). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED458219.pdf

4. Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.

5. Banilower, E. R., Boyd, S. E., Pasley, J. D., & Weiss, I. R. (2006). Lessons from a decade of mathematics and science reform: A capstone report for the local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Horizon Research, Inc. http://www.pdmathsci.net/reports/capstone.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3