1. Allwright, R. (1980). Turns, topics, and tasks: Patterns of participation in language teaching and learning. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis and second language acquisition (pp. 165–187). Newbury House.
2. Aukrust, V. G. (2008). Boys’ and girls’ conversational participation across four grade levels in Norwegian classrooms: Taking the floor or being given the floor? Gender and Education, 20(3), 237–252.
3. Barwell, R. (2013). Discursive psychology as an alternative perspective on mathematics teacher knowledge. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 45(4), 595–606.
4. Battey, D., Neal, R. A., Leyva, L., & Adams-Wiggins, K. (2016). The interconnectedness of relational and content dimensions of quality instruction: Supportive teacher–student relationships in urban elementary mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 1–19.
5. Berry, R. Q., III. (2018). Positioning students as mathematically competent. NCTM President’s message, July 26, 2018. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.nctm.org/News-and-Calendar/Messages-from-the-President/Archive/Robert-Q_-Berry-III/Positioning-Students-as-Mathematically-Competent/.