Author:
Porra Jaana,Lacity Mary,Parks Michael S.
Abstract
AbstractDigital assistants engage with us with increasingly human-like conversations, including the expression of human emotions with such utterances as “I am sorry…”, “I hope you enjoy…”, “I am grateful…”, or “I regret that…”. By 2021, digital assistants will outnumber humans. No one seems to stop to ask if creating more digital companions that appear increasingly human is really beneficial to the future of our species. In this essay, we pose the question: “How human should computer-based human-likeness appear?” We rely on the philosophy of humanness and the theory of speech acts to consider the long-term consequences of living with digital creatures that express human-like feelings. We argue that feelings are the very substance of our humanness and therefore are best reserved for human interaction.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Information Systems,Theoretical Computer Science,Software
Reference107 articles.
1. Aakhus, M. (2004). Felicity conditions and genre: Linking act and conversation in LAP style conversation analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th international working conference on the language-action perspective on communication modelling (pp. 131–140).
2. Ågerfalk, P., & Eriksson, O. (2002). Action-oriented conceptual Modelling. European Journal of Information System, 13(1), 80–92.
3. Allwood, J. (1977). A critical look at speech act theory. In Dahl (Ed.), Logic, pragmatics, and grammar (pp. 53–69). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
4. Alter, S. (2019). Making sense of smartness in tge context of smart devices and smart systems. Information Systems Frontiers, April 24th, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09919-9.
5. Auramäki, E., Lehtinen, E., & Lyytinen, K. (1988). A speech-act-based office Modelling approach. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(2), 126–152.
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献