Social Media Platforms and User Engagement: A Multi-Platform Study on One-way Firm Sustainability Communication

Author:

Jha Ashish KumarORCID,Verma Nishant Kumar

Abstract

AbstractThere have been multiple research studies in recent days that have analyzed the growing role of social media in firms’ communication strategy as well as the role of social media in shaping a firm’s reputation. However, most of these studies focus on one of the multiple social media platforms that firms use. In this study, we argue that there are nuances in firms’ social media communication strategies depending on the platforms. Given the rising importance of sustainability, we focus on firms’ sustainability-related communication. We analyze the impact of firms’ one-way sustainability communication over Twitter and Facebook on the respective platforms’ user engagement. The engagement has been computed as likes and shares (likes and retweets) over the firm generated one-way sustainability communication-related posts. Using a panel dataset of a 3-year period for S&P 500 firms having active social media profiles on both platforms, we demonstrate the difference in the firms’ sustainability communication on the two platforms. We also find evidence that users on both platforms have different preferences, such as messaging from firms. Using a differential metric in our analysis helps us counter the firm-level fixed effects. We find evidence suggesting that firms would do well by having different strategies for different platforms. Firms would benefit by focusing on sustainability relevant and bite-sized content on Twitter, but more positive and engaging content on Facebook.

Funder

University of Dublin, Trinity College

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Information Systems,Theoretical Computer Science,Software

Reference91 articles.

1. Aral, S., Dellarocas, C., & Godes, D. (2013). Introduction to the special issue—social media and business transformation: a framework for research. Information systems research, 24(1), 3–13.

2. Arora, A., Bansal, S., Kandpal, C., Aswani, R., & Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 86–101.

3. Barnes, N., Mazzola, A., & Killeen, M. (2020). Oversaturation & disengagement: The 2019 fortune 500 social media dance.Center for Marketing Research of the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 9.

4. Bendell, J. (2017). Terms for endearment: business, NGOs and sustainable development. Routledge.

5. Brown, E. (2021). Facebook, Instagram or Twitter? Business owners share their preferred social media platforms for research and marketing. ZDNet. Retrieved Dcember 16, 2021 from https://www.zdnet.com/article/facebook-instagram-or-twitter-business-owners-share-their-preferred-social-media-platforms-for-research-and-marketing/

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3