Author:
Strauss Christina,Harr Michael Dominic,Pieper Torsten M.
Abstract
AbstractDigital communication has become an essential part of both personal and professional contexts. However, unique characteristics of digital communication—such as lacking non-verbal cues or time asynchrony—clearly distinguish this new form of communication from traditional face-to-face communication. These differences raise questions about the transferability of previous findings on traditional communication to the digital communication context and emphasize the need for specialized research. To support and guide research on the analysis of digital communication, we conducted a systematic literature review encompassing 84 publications on digital communication in leading journals. By doing so, we provide an overview of the current body of research. Thereby, we focus on distinct fields of communication, methods used to collect and analyze digital communication data, as well as common methodological limitations. Building on these insights, we derive a series of comprehensive guidelines from five distinct areas for the collection and analysis of digital communication that can guide future research and organizational practice.
Funder
Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference205 articles.
1. Apple (2023) Apple Unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced chips for a personal computer. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/10/apple-unveils-m3-m3-pro-and-m3-max-the-most-advanced-chips-for-a-personal-computer/. Accessed 1 Feb 2024
2. Alonzo M, Aiken M (2004) Flaming in electronic communication. Decis Support Syst 36(3):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00190-2
3. Aksnes DW, Langfeldt L, Wouters P (2019) Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic Concepts and theories. SAGE Open 9(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
4. Aleti T, Pallant JI, Tuan A, van Laer T (2019) Tweeting with the stars: automated text analysis of the effect of celebrity social media communications on consumer word of mouth. J Interact Mark 48(1):17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2019.03.003
5. Al-Garadi MA, Varathan KD, Ravana SD (2016) Cybercrime detection in online communications: the experimental case of cyberbullying detection in the twitter network. Comput Hum Behav 63:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.051