Author:
Pilipiec Patrick,Groot Wim,Pavlova Milena
Abstract
AbstractDue to rapid demographic ageing and to sustain its pension system, the Netherlands recently initiated a pension reform that increased the retirement age, with the intention to increase labour force participation among older workers. However, there is little evidence on the preferences of workers concerning their retirement age, and on how these preferences have changed over time. To identify personal and work-related determinants of the preference toward earlier or later retirement, and how these determinants and preferences have changed over time. We use data from three consecutive measurements (waves) of a large Dutch panel. Ordered logit regression is used to investigate the predictors of retirement preferences. Analyses are performed for two groups; all workers and a subsample of workers aged 50 years or older. Furthermore, the analyses are performed for each wave separately and for the combined dataset. A preference for later retirement is primarily related to university education, high job satisfaction, and high income. Age is only positively related to later retirement among older workers. Earlier retirement is preferred by female workers and workers living with a partner. The preference toward an earlier retirement age has increased over time. The preferences toward retirement can be primarily explained by personal characteristics, job satisfaction, and net income. Furthermore, with the increase in the retirement age defined by current legislation, the preference for an earlier retirement age has increased over time.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography
Reference101 articles.
1. Alcover, C. M., Topa, G., Parry, E., Fraccaroli, F., & Depolo, M. (2014). Bridge employment. A research handbook. New York: Routledge.
2. Altman, Y., Baruch, Y., Manrique-de-Lara, P. Z., & Armas, M. M. V. (2019). Baby boomers at the cusp of their academic career: Storming ahead, hanging on, or calling it a day. Studies in Higher Education.
3. Arber, S., & Ginn, J. (1995). Choice and constraint in the retirement of older married women. In G. Arber & J. Ginn (Eds.), Connecting gender and ageing: A sociological approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. Axelrad, H., & McNamara, T. K. (2018). Gates to retirement and gender differences: Macroeconomic conditions, job satisfaction, and age. Journal of Women & Aging, 30(6), 503–519.
5. Bahrami, B. (2001). Factors affecting faculty retirement decisions. The Social Science Journal, 38(2), 297–305.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献