Advancing a cultural change agenda in higher education: issues and values related to reimagining academic leadership

Author:

Whittaker Joseph A.ORCID,Montgomery Beronda L.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractTraditional models of academic leadership are based largely on managerial and transactional approaches. Such efforts frequently support status quo individual success rather than values-based leadership based on collective institutional or sustainability-centered pursuits. Evolved reward systems and leaderships modes that support collective and institution-level effort and innovations prioritizing community and sustainability require new leadership models. Innovative leadership models that transcend traditional gatekeeping are needed and four leadership modes to support innovation and collective efforts are discussed, including shared leadership that draws on distributed contributions of multiple individuals; creative or innovative leadership that requires risk-taking, experimentation, and experiential learning; qualitative leadership that is data-driven and includes evidence-based innovation; and, dynamic leadership based on demonstrated agility and ability to traverse different spaces using diverse modes of doing and thinking. Progressive leaders can move in and out of these modes in response to ecosystem needs, demands, and changes through the use of design thinking and initiatives to support innovation and sustainability in higher education. Success in evolved leadership approaches, including centering sustainability goals that impact institutions themselves and communities in which they exist, require aligning reformed leadership goals and practices with funding models and reward systems, as well as policies and institutional change strategies.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Michigan State University Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Montgomery BL. Academic leadership: gatekeeping or groundskeeping? J Values-Based Leadersh. 2020;13(2):16.

2. Montgomery BL, Whittaker JA. Reimagining academic leadership. ASBMB Today. 2021;20(6):61–4.

3. Kruse SD, Hackmann DG, Lindle JC. Academic leadership during a pandemic: department heads leading with a focus on equity. Front Educ. 2020;5:614641.

4. Haddock-Fraser J, Rands P, Scoffham S. Leadership for sustainability in higher education. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2018.

5. Cheruvelil KS, Montgomery BL. Professional development of women leaders. In: Rennison CM, Bonomi A, editors. Women leading change in academia: breaking the glass ceiling, cliff, and slipper. San Diego: Cognella Academic Publishing; 2019. p. 235–54.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3