Abstract
AbstractInnovative initiatives in education often have problems with their sustainability. The present study focuses on three educational innovations that have proved to be sustainable over time. We used a qualitative research approach to study and identify essential features of sustainable educational innovation. Two theoretical frameworks were used to guide the study: the integrated model for sustainable innovation (IMSI) and self-determination theory (SDT). Both frameworks take a different perspective upon learning; IMSI presents learning at the individual level, the team level and the organizational level to be the heart of sustainable innovation, and SDT presents how learning can be improved. The research question focused upon how the SDT concepts of autonomy, competence and relatedness were perceived within sustainable innovation, expressed by the IMSI framework, by teachers and school leaders. Based on our findings we demonstrate that the framework of IMSI and SDT can effectively be applied as a frame of analysis to identify essential features of sustainability in educational innovations and we discuss how concepts of SDT deepen the knowledge of sustainable educational innovation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (2014). Embedding school health into school improvement policy. International Journal of School Health, 1(3), e24546.
2. Boom-Muilenburg, van den, E., Tappel, A., Schildkamp, K., & Poortman, C. (2020). Duurzame onderwijsontwikkeling door professionele leergemeenschappen: Leiderschap als smaakmaker [sustainable educational change by professional learning communities: leadership as flavor]. School Management Totaal. https://www.utwente.nl/nl/bms/elan/duurzame-onderwijs-ontwikkeling/presentaties-publicaties/Presentaties-Opslag/ltr-p032-ltr-schoza-02-2020-002.pdf.
3. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.
4. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.
5. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献