Abstract
AbstractRecent research shows the importance to teach students the self-regulated use of effective learning strategies at university. However, the effects of such training programs on students’ metacognitive knowledge, use of learning strategies, and academic performance in the longer term are unknown. In the present study, all first-year pharmacology students from one university attended a learning strategy training program, i.e., the ‘Study Smart program’, in their first weeks. The 20% (n = 25) lowest scoring students on the first midterm received further support regarding their learning strategies. Results showed that all students gained accurate metacognitive knowledge about (in)effective learning strategies in the short- and long-term and reported to use less highlighting, less rereading, but more interleaving, elaboration, and distributed practice after the training program. Academic performance was compared to the prior cohort, which had not received the Study Smart program. While in the previous cohort, students in the top, middle, and bottom rank of midterm 1 stayed in these ranks and still differed significantly in the final exam, students in the Study Smart cohort that received the training program improved throughout the year and differences between ranks were significantly reduced. A learning strategy training program including a remediation track for lower performing students can thus support students to study more effectively and enhance equal chances for all students at university.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference51 articles.
1. Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: a meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659–701. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316689306
2. Al-Kadri, H. M., Al-Moamary, M. S., Roberts, C., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2012). Exploring assessment factors contributing to students’ study strategies: Literature review. Medical Teacher, 34(Suppl 1), S42–S50. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.656756
3. Biwer, F., de Bruin, A. B. H., Schreurs, S., & oude Egbrink, M. G. A. (2020). Future steps in teaching desirably difficult learning strategies: Reflections from the study smart program. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.07.006
4. Biwer, F., Egbrink, M. G. A., Aalten, P., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2020). Fostering effective learning strategies in higher education—a mixed-methods study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.03.004
5. Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher & J. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (2nd (edition, pp. 59–68). Worth.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献