Author:
Ibrahim Kinda,Weller Susie,Elvidge Elissa,Tavener Meredith
Abstract
AbstractThis article explores experiences of teaching qualitative research (QR) broadly, and qualitative methods (QM) more specifically in medicine, highlighting the challenges faced, and offering recommendations for overcoming them. Using collective online interviews, collaborative autoethnography (CAE) was employed to generate data comprising educator’s reflective accounts of teaching QM in medical schools across two continents. Three main themes were identified through collaborative thematic analysis: making meaningful contributions from a marginalized position; finding our pedagogical feet; and recognizing the translational applicability and value of QR. We reflected on the marginalized positioning of QM in medical curricula and the underestimation of the value of QR to understanding pressing health issues. Analysis of these reflections pointed to a lack of formal training for educators and curriculum space for qualitative approaches. Our teaching pedagogies, developed through our own research experiences, self-reflection and student feedback, were primarily student-centered employing a range of novel approaches designed to foster skills and interest in the craft of QR, and introduce a greater appreciation of the significance of QR approaches to medicine. CAE further allowed us to identify some key recommendations that could help medical educators plan for teaching QM and other research methods more effectively in medicine. Future curriculum development should consider the benefits of exposing learners to a range of methods and approaches from across the qualitative-quantitative spectrum.
Funder
KI is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference45 articles.
1. Blalock, A. E. & M. Akehi (2018). Collaborative autoethnography as a pathway for transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education 16(2), 89–107.
2. Bolander Laksov, K., Dornan, T., & Teunissen, P. W. (2017). Making theory explicit—An analysis of how medical education research(ers) describe how they connect to theory. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 18.
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
4. Breuer, F., & Schreier, M. (2007). Issues in learning about and teaching qualitative research methods and methodology in the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research.
5. Bunniss, S., & Kelly, D. R. (2010). Research paradigms in medical education research. Medical Education, 44(4), 358–366.