Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the potential relationships between the use of different section of food label, and healthy and pathological aspects of orthorexia among adults.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey (n = 1326). Inclusion criteria were being 19–64 years and graduated from at least primary school. Pregnant and lactating women were excluded. Data were collected using questionnaire including socio-demographic variables, lifestyle factors, body weight and height, frequency of reading different sections of food label (“always”, “when buying a food for the first time”, “when comparing similar packaged foods”, “rarely”, “never”), food label literacy, and Teruel Orthorexia Scale. Participants were categorized as nutrition facts panel-users, ingredients list-users or claim-users if they read at least one item from the relevant parts.
Results
The proportions of nutrition facts, ingredients list, and claims sections users were 72.3%, 76.3%, and 79.9%, respectively. Both healthy and pathological aspects of orthorexia were associated with reading food labels. The healthy orthorexia had the strongest association with using the ingredients list (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.41–2.20), whereas the orthorexia nervosa showed the highest association with using nutrition facts panel (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.20–1.81). While women, physically active participants and those with higher food label literacy were more likely to use all sections of food labels; older age, having children, and chronic disease increased the likelihood of using claims and ingredients list (p < 0.05). Besides, following a diet was associated with higher use of nutrition facts and ingredients list (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
The study demonstrates that food label users have higher orthorexia tendencies compared to non-users. Of the food label sections, healthy orthorexia showed the strongest association with use of the list of ingredients, while pathological orthorexia showed the strongest association with use of the nutrition facts panel.
Level of evidence
Level V, cross-sectional study.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Baker P, Machado P, Santos T et al (2020) Ultra-processed foods and the nutrition transition: global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers. Obes Rev 21(12):e13126. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13126
2. Popkin BM, Reardon T (2018) Obesity and the food system transformation in Latin America. Obes Rev 19(8):1028–1064
3. Sievert K, Lawrence M, Naika A, Baker P (2019) Processed foods and nutrition transition in the Pacific: regional trends, patterns and food system drivers. Nutrients 11(6):1328. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11061328
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture (2023) 2015–2020 Dietary guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition. https://health.gov/our-work/food-nutrition/previous-dietary-guidelines/2015. Accessed 10 December 2023
5. Ministry of Health of Brazil (2023) Dietary guidelines for the Brazilian population, 1st edition. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/dietary_guidelines_brazilian_population.pdf. Accessed 9 December 2023