Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Increased Adoption Throughout 2020

Author:

Stansbury Nicole,Barnes Brian,Adams Amy,Berlien Ruth,Branco Danilo,Brown Debby,Butler Paula,Garson Lauren,Jendrasek Debra,Manasco Garrett,Ramirez Nycole,Sanjuan Nelly,Worman Gillian,Adelfio AninaORCID

Abstract

AbstractWith the emergence of new technologies for data collection, the continued impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the increasing number of partially or fully decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), the importance of risk-based monitoring (RBM) and the larger risk-based quality management (RBQM) framework in clinical trial management is increasing. RBM and RBQM focus on the detection of events or trends that impact trial quality in terms of participant safety and data integrity. In 2019, the Association of Clinical Research Organizations (ACRO) began a landscape survey of RBM/RBQM implementation in ongoing clinical trials. Initial results of this survey, representing full-year data for 2019, were reported previously. Here, we present full-year landscape data for 2020 drawn from 5,987 clinical trials ongoing at the end of 2020, including 908 new studies started that year. Of these trials, 77% implemented at least one RBM/RBQM component, an increase from 47% for studies ongoing at the end of 2019. We also observed increased implementation for three of the five RBM components included in the survey. Centralized monitoring decreased nominally in 2020 compared with 2019. Although the percentages of 2020 trials incorporating reduced source data verification (SDV) and reduced source data review (SDR) increased from 2019 to 2020, these numbers are still low considering the large percentage of trials implementing at least one RBQM component. In the current clinical trial landscape, as more DCTs are launched and new data collection technologies are implemented, there remains a pressing need for greater use of centralized monitoring coupled with reductions in SDR/SDV and, ultimately, greater adoption of RBM and RBQM.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

Reference11 articles.

1. EMA. Reflection Paper on Risk Based Quality Management in Clinical Trials. Published November 18, 2013. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/reflection-paper-risk-based-quality-management-clinical-trials_en.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2021

2. ACRO. Establishing Risk-Based Monitoring Within a Quality-Based System as “Best Practice” for Clinical Studies—ACRO. Published online 2019. https://www.acrohealth.org/rbqm-report/. Accessed 29 Oct 2021

3. Barnes B, Stansbury N, Brown D, et al. Risk-based monitoring in clinical trials: past, present, and future. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021;55(4):899–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00295-8.

4. EMA. Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (version 4). Published April 2, 2021. Updated February 4, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-10/guidanceclinicaltrials_covid19_en.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2021

5. FDA. FDA Guidance on Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products during COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Published July 6, 2020. Updated August 30, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/fda-guidance-conduct-clinical-trials-medical-products-during-covid-19-public-health-emergency. Accessed 29 Oct 2021

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3