Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future

Author:

Barnes Brian,Stansbury Nicole,Brown Debby,Garson Lauren,Gerard Geoff,Piccoli Nickolas,Jendrasek Debra,May Nick,Castillo Vanesa,Adelfio AninaORCID,Ramirez Nycole,McSweeney Andrea,Berlien Ruth,Butler Paula Jo

Abstract

AbstractRisk-based monitoring (RBM) is a powerful tool for efficiently ensuring patient safety and data integrity in a clinical trial, enhancing overall trial quality. To better understand the state of RBM implementation across the clinical trial industry, the Association of Clinical Research Organizations (ACRO) conducted a landscape survey among its member companies across 6,513 clinical trials ongoing at the end of 2019. Of these trials, 22% included at least 1 of the 5 RBM components: key risk indicators (KRIs), centralized monitoring, off-site/remote-site monitoring, reduced source data verification (SDV), and reduced source document review (SDR). The implementation rates for the individual RBM components ranged 8%–19%, with the most frequently implemented component being centralized monitoring and the least frequently implemented being reduced SDR. When the COVID-19 pandemic emerged in early 2020, additional data were collected to assess its impact on trial monitoring, focusing specifically on trials switching from on-site monitoring to off-site/remote-site monitoring. These mid-pandemic data show that the vast majority of monitoring visits were on-site in February 2020, but an even higher percentage were off-site in April, corresponding with the first peak of the pandemic. Despite this shift, similar numbers of non-COVID-related protocol deviations were detected from February through June, suggesting little or no reduction in monitoring effectiveness. The pre- and mid-pandemic data provide two very different snapshots of RBM implementation, but both support the need to promote adoption of this approach while also highlighting an opportunity to capitalize on the recent shift toward greater RBM uptake in a post-pandemic environment.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

Reference9 articles.

1. ACRO. Establishing Risk-Based Monitoring within a Quality-Based System as “Best Practice” for Clinical Studies – ACRO [Internet]. 2019. https://www.acrohealth.org/rbqm-report/. Accessed 8 October 2020

2. ACRO. Risk Based Quality Management (RBQM) – A Collaborative Approach to Holistic Clinical Trial Oversight [Internet]. 2019. https://www.acrohealth.org/oversight-rbqm-paper/. Accessed 8 October 2020

3. EMA. Reflection paper on risk based quality management in clinical trials [Internet]. 2013. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/reflection-paper-risk-based-quality-management-clinical-trials_en.pdf

4. Rosenberg MJ. Key considerations in the transition to risk-based monitoring. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014;48(4):428–35.

5. ICH. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2) [Internet]. 2016. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E6_R2_Addendum.pdf. Accessed 7 August 2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3