Comprehensive Assessment of Risk-Based Quality Management Adoption in Clinical Trials

Author:

Dirks AbigailORCID,Florez Maria,Torche Francois,Young Steve,Slizgi Brian,Getz Kenneth

Abstract

Abstract Background Risk-based monitoring (RBM) and risk-based quality management (RBQM) offer a compelling approach to increase efficiency, speed and quality in clinical trials by prioritizing and mitigating risks related to essential safety and efficacy data. Since 2013, the FDA and EMA have encouraged the use of RBM/RBQM, however adoption has been slow with limited understanding of the barriers to adoption. Methods The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted an online survey among pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and contract research organizations and gathered 206 responses on 32 distinct RBQM practices. Results On average, companies implemented RBQM in 57% of their clinical trials. Lower levels of adoption were observed among companies conducting fewer than 25 trials annually (48%) compared to those conducting more than 100 trials annually (63%). Primary barriers to adoption include lack of organizational knowledge and awareness, mixed perceptions of the value proposition of RBQM, and poor change management planning and execution. Insights into improving the level of adoption are discussed.

Funder

CluePoints

Price Waterhouse Coopers

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference8 articles.

1. European Medicines Agency, Reflection paper on risk-based quality management in clinical trials. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/reflection-paper-risk-based-quality-management-clinical-trials_en.pdf.Accessed 18 Nov 2013.

2. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Guidance for industry oversight of clinical investigations—A risk-based approach to monitoring. https://www.fda.gov/media/116754/download. Accessed Aug 2013.

3. Yu L, Amidon G, Khan M, Hoag S, Polli J, Raju G, Woodcock J. Understanding pharmaceutical quality by design. AAPS J. 2014;16(4):771–83.

4. Stansbury N, Barnes B, Adams A, et al. Risk-based monitoring in clinical trials: increased adoption throughout 2020. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022;56:415–22.

5. Adams A, Adelfio A, Barnes B, et al. Risk-based monitoring in clinical trials: 2021 update. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023;57:529–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-022-00496-9.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3