Author:
Belisle Jordan,Paliliunas Dana,Stanley Caleb R.,Barron Becky F.,Dixon Mark R.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Arntzen, E. (2004). Probability of equivalence formation: Familiar stimuli and training sequence. The Psychological Record, 54, 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395474.
2. Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (2000). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of class size vs. number of classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395344.
3. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Smeets, P. M., Cullinan, V., & Leader, G. (2004). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence: Conceptual and procedural issues. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4, 181–214.
4. Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2020a). Relational density theory: Nonlinearity of equivalence relating examined through higher-order volumetric-mass-density. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(2), 259–283.
5. Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2020b). An exploratory analysis of relational density theory: Relational resistance and gravity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 19, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.01.013.