Abstract
AbstractReading, at its core, is a basic yet critical way to undertake learning and growth. This paper shares a professional learning and development initiative for science educators, which was underpinned by the popularity and premise of the reading group. In moving from simply being a vehicle for targeted discussion, the reading group facilitators sought to support the participants in taking a deeper dive into their practice with the impact ultimately being changes to their personal pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for science. This small-scale qualitative study was informed by the voices of three science educators at different stages and career trajectories, who participated in interviews. The data revealed that their participation in the reading group informed the development of their personal and collective PCK by (a) creating conditions that encouraged meaningful links to be made between theory and practice, (b) encouraging the adoption of an inquiry stance as a means for engaging purposively with professional knowledge, and (c) initiating a transformation in their contemporary understandings of science and science education. By drawing on the participants’ narratives, this study brings to the fore both the simplicity and depth of complexity that can be achieved through a reading group focused on professional learning and development. The implications of this research are wide reaching as the reading group as a concept can be applied to a variety of contexts and shaped to reach a variety of educational needs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Mathematics,Education
Reference61 articles.
1. Alonzo, A. C., & Kim, J. (2016). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video based interview methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1259–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21271
2. Atkins, L., & Wallace, S. (2012). Qualitative research in education. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957602
3. Bausmith, J. M., & Barry, C. (2011). Revisiting professional learning communities to increase college readiness: The importance of pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 40(4), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11409927
4. Broemmel, A. D., Evans, K. R., Lester, J. N., Rigell, A., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2019). Teacher reading as professional development: Insights from a national survey. Reading Horizons (Online), 58(1), 1–21. Retrieved February 25, 2022. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol58/iss1/2/
5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献