Abstract
AbstractThis paper deals with the classification of volcanic activity into three classes, referred to as Quite, Strombolian and Paroxysm. The main purpose is to give a measure of the reliability with which such a classification, typically carried out by experts, can be performed by Machine Learning algorithms, by using the volcanic tremor as a feature. Both supervised and unsupervised methods are considered. It is experimentally shown that at least the Paroxysm activity can be reliably classified. Performances are rigorously assessed, in comparison with the classification made by expert volcanologists, in terms of popular indices such as the f1-score and the Area under the ROC curve (AuC). The work is basically a case study carried out on a dataset recorded in the area of the Mt Etna volcano. However, as volcanic tremor is a geophysical signal widely available, considered methods and strategies can be easily applied to similar volcanic areas.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Catania
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference27 articles.
1. Bano S, Khan MNA (2018) A survey of data clustering methods. Int J Adv Sc Technol 113:133–142. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijast.2018.113.14
2. Bergen KJ, Johnson PA, de Hoop MV, Beroza GC (2019) Machine learning for datadriven discovery in solid Earth geoscience. Science 363:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0323
3. Bezdec JC (1981) Algorithms, pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0450-1
4. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–758
5. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) 11 Classification and regression trees. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 246–280
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献