Phenotyping a diversity panel of quinoa using UAV-retrieved leaf area index, SPAD-based chlorophyll and a random forest approach
-
Published:2022-01-23
Issue:3
Volume:23
Page:961-983
-
ISSN:1385-2256
-
Container-title:Precision Agriculture
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Precision Agric
Author:
Jiang JialeORCID, Johansen Kasper, Stanschewski Clara S., Wellman Gordon, Mousa Magdi A. A., Fiene Gabriele M., Asiry Khalid A., Tester Mark, McCabe Matthew F.
Abstract
AbstractGiven its high nutritional value and capacity to grow in harsh environments, quinoa has significant potential to address a range of food security concerns. Monitoring the development of phenotypic traits during field trials can provide insights into the varieties best suited to specific environmental conditions and management strategies. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide a promising means for phenotyping and offer the potential for new insights into relative plant performance. During a field trial exploring 141 quinoa accessions, a UAV-based multispectral camera was deployed to retrieve leaf area index (LAI) and SPAD-based chlorophyll across 378 control and 378 saline-irrigated plots using a random forest regression approach based on both individual spectral bands and 25 different vegetation indices (VIs) derived from the multispectral imagery. Results show that most VIs had stronger correlation with the LAI and SPAD-based chlorophyll measurements than individual bands. VIs including the red-edge band had high importance in SPAD-based chlorophyll predictions, while VIs including the near infrared band (but not the red-edge band) improved LAI prediction models. When applied to individual treatments (i.e. control or saline), the models trained using all data (i.e. both control and saline data) achieved high mapping accuracies for LAI (R2 = 0.977–0.980, RMSE = 0.119–0.167) and SPAD-based chlorophyll (R2 = 0.983–0.986, RMSE = 2.535–2.861). Overall, the study demonstrated that UAV-based remote sensing is not only useful for retrieving important phenotypic traits of quinoa, but that machine learning models trained on all available measurements can provide robust predictions for abiotic stress experiments.
Funder
a collaborative project between the King Abdallah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) and King Abdulaziz University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference85 articles.
1. Adolf, V. I., Shabala, S., Andersen, M. N., Razzaghi, F., & Jacobsen, S.-E. (2012). Varietal differences of quinoa’s tolerance to saline conditions. Plant and Soil, 357(1–2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00446.x 2. Aguilar, P. C., & Jacobsen, S.-E. (2003). Cultivation of quinoa on the Peruvian Altiplano. Food Reviews International, 19, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-120018866 3. Ali, M., Montzka, C., Stadler, A., Menz, G., Thonfeld, F., & Vereecken, H. (2015). Estimation and validation of RapidEye-based time-series of leaf area index for winter wheat in the Ruhr catchment (Germany). Remote Sensing, 7(3), 2808–2831. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70302808 4. Alvar-Beltrán, J., Fabbri, C., Verdi, L., Truschi, S., Dalla Marta, A., & Orlandini, S. (2020). Testing proximal optical sensors on Quinoa growth and development. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12121958 5. Awlia, M., Alshareef, N., Saber, N., Korte, A., Oakey, H., Panzarová, K., et al. (2021). Genetic mapping of the early responses to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Journal, 107(2), 544–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15310
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|