1. Aldon, G. (Ed.). (2009). La function de l’ensegne. Mathématiques dynamiques. (pp. 46–68). Paris, France: Hachette Livre.
2. Artigue, M. (2001). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. Paper presented at CAME 2001 Symposium. Communicating Mathematics Through Computer Algebra Systems. Utrecht, The Netherlands. Retrieved 13th March 2008 from: http://Itsn.mathstore.ac.uk/came/events/freudenthal .
3. Artigue, M. (2005). The integration of symbolic calculators into secondary education: Some lessons from didactical engineering. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven, & L. Trouche (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument (pp. 231–294). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
4. Ball, L., & Pierce, R. (2004). CAS: Trainer wheels for algebra using the TI89. In B. Tadich, S. Tobias, C. Brew, B. Beatty, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Towards excellence in mathematics. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the MAV, (pp. 13–21). Melbourne: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
5. Ball, L., & Stacey, K. (2003). What should students record when solving problems with CAS? Reasons, information, the plan and some answers. In J. T. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. Mullin, & R. M. Zbiek (Eds.), Computer algebra systems in secondary school mathematics education (pp. 289–303). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.