Reducing organizational inequalities associated with algorithmic controls

Author:

Li Yueqi,Xiang Biyun

Abstract

AbstractAlgorithmic technologies are widely applied in organizational decision-making today, which can improve resource allocation and decision-making coordination to facilitate the accuracy and efficiency of the decision-making process within and across organizations. However, algorithmic controls also introduce and amplify organizational inequalities—workers who are female, people of color and the marginalized population, and workers with low skills, a low level of education, or who have low technology literacy can be disadvantaged and discriminated against due to the lack of transparency, explainability, objectivity, and accountability in these algorithms. Through a systematic literature review, this study comprehensively compares three different types of controls in organizations: technical controls, bureaucratic controls, and algorithmic controls, which led to our understanding of the advantages and disadvantages associated with algorithmic controls. The literature on the organizational inequality related to the employment of algorithmic controls is then discussed and summarized. Finally, we explore the potential of trustworthy algorithmic controls and participatory development of algorithms to mitigate organizational inequalities associated with algorithmic controls. Our findings raise the awareness related to the potential corporate inequalities associated with algorithmic controls in organizations and endorse the development of future generations of hiring and employment algorithms through trustworthy and participatory approaches.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference129 articles.

1. Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A. Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Acad Manag Ann. 2020;14(1):366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174.

2. Rodgers W, Murray JM, Stefanidis A, Degbey WY, Tarba SY. An artificial intelligence algorithmic approach to ethical decision-making in human resource management processes. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2023;33(1): 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100925.

3. Liu M, Huang Y, Zhang D. Gamification’s impact on manufacturing: enhancing job motivation, satisfaction and operational performance with smartphone-based gamified job design. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind. 2018;28(1):38–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20723.

4. Liu YE, Mandel T, Brunskill E, Popovic Z. Trading off scientific knowledge and user learning with multi-armed bandits. In EDM, London, United Kingdom; 2014. pp. 161–168.

5. European Commission. Proposal for regulation of the European parliament and of the council—Laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. 2021, April 21. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence. Accessed 7 December 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3