Types of Lexical Information

Author:

Fillmore Charles J.

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Reference31 articles.

1. I have borrowed these terms from philosopher Richard Garner, to whom I am also indebted for a number of suggestions on the content and phrasing of several sections of this paper.

2. The disjunction in this statement may be unnecessary if we accept John R. Ross’s arguments that declarative sentences have phonetically unrealized embedding sentences representable as something like I DECLARE TO YOU THAT…. On Ross’s view every sentence contains at least one locutionary verb, so that the difference we are after is a difference between references to the ‘next higher’ locutionary verb and reference to the ‘highest’ locutionary verbs. See John R. Ross, ‘On Declarative Sentences’, to appear in Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn and Blaisdell, 1969.

3. See Charles J. Fillmore, ‘Deictic Categories in the Semantics of “COME”, Foundations of Language 2 (1966) 219–27.

4. There is an additional use of deictic words, and that is this: in a third person narrative, one can express one’s ‘identification’ with one of the characters in the narrative by letting that character be the focus of words that are primarily appropriate to hic-nunc-ego. Thus we may find in an exclusively third-person narrative a passage like (i) (i) here was where Francis had always hoped to be, and today was to mark for him the beginning of a new life in which the words HERE and TODAY refer to the place and time focused on in the narrative, not to the place and time associated with the author’s act of communication. In what might be referred to as the ‘displaced ego’ use of deictic words, the author has shown us that he has for the moment assumed Francis’s point of view.

5. I propose that a rather subtle test of psycho-sexual identity can be devised which makes use of a story in which two characters, one male and one female, do a lot of cross-visiting, but in their other activities do nothing that makes one of them clearly more lovable than the other. The subject’s task is to listen to the story and then retell it in his own words. The writer of the original story must not use the words COME and Go; but if the subject, in retelling the story, states, say, that BILL CAME TO MARY’S HOUSE (using CAME rather than WENT), this fact will reveal that he is experiencing the story from Mary’s point of view.

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Inferencing and Functional Approach to Text: Based on Simultaneous Interpreting;RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics;2022-07-14

2. Universal Semantic Markup and Top-Level Ontology Representation;Open Semantic Technologies for Intelligent Systems;2022

3. Verbing and Linguistic Innovation;Frontiers in Communication;2021-07-08

4. The lexical and formal semantics of distributivity;Glossa: a journal of general linguistics;2021-03-24

5. Stereotype of a Profession in the Semantics of an English Conversed Verb;PROBLEMS OF SEMANTICS, PRAGMATICS AND COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3