Abstract
AbstractIn Chap. 10.1007/978-3-030-78885-8_5, Dennis Niemann analyzes international organizations (IOs) and their education ideas. Different ideological paradigms dominated the global education discourse at different periods. Fundamentally, they revolve around two poles of an economic utilitarian view on education and on an interpretation that emphasizes the social and cultural value of education. Both leitmotifs were influenced by general developments in world politics, and they were also reflected within IOs. Niemann analyzes how global education IOs, specifically the World Bank, the OECD, UNESCO, and the ILO, influenced the global discourse on education. First, he argues that within the IOs, the antipodal views on education became more complementary over time. Second, he demonstrates the pattern of interaction between the IOs has also changed from competition to cooperation.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference75 articles.
1. Armingeon, Klaus. 2004. OECD and National Welfare State Development. In The OECD and European Welfare States, ed. Klaus Armingeon and Michelle Beyeler, 226–241. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2. Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World. International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
3. Béland, Daniel, and Robert H. Cox. 2011. Introduction: Ideas and politics. In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, ed. Daniel Béland and Robert H. Cox, 3–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Blyth, Mark M. 2003. Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 1 (4): 695–706.
5. Bonal, Xavier, and Aina Tarabini-Castellani. 2009. Global Solutions for Global Poverty?: The World Bank Education Policy and the Anti-Poverty Agenda. In Re-reading Education Policies, ed. Maarten Simons, Mark Olssen, and Michael A. Peters, 96–111. Rotterdam et al.: Sense Publishers.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献